Interpretation of dreams- Frued

I m back into business!!!
This season gave me immence time and space to ponder over the backlog of some very extensive reading and completing two very intellectual piece of writings in non fiction area in just a week which kinda reminded me of my days of thunder.
So Interpretation of dreams is considered one of most important work done sofar in psychology. The book is precise and terse. Theories supported with ample number of illustrations and emotionless dissection of every module of dreams is somewhat which will obviously tickle the spine of guiless readers. The author has refuted all the plebian and anarchial allutions made regarding dreams and has presented a very scientific approach in defining one of the esctatic yet fundamental nature of human mind.
Now comes the big question. Is this book a good for layback readers?
Answer is Yes!

An anamoly with fruedian books, this book , though a crude scientific dossier, is adaptive to common readers. However there is a word of caution here. Since the book doesnt care about how it will affect an average readers' value system, it may turn out to be a blasphemy for psuedoreligious ones. Also for people who are very dogged in their faith inclinations may feel lost somewhere as Frued has left no stones unturned to discover almost any type of dream. May it be nightmares,REM(Rapid Eye Movement)types,lascivious dreams, Plain recollective dreams; all of them!

In all this book is a highly intellectual piece of work and legendry.

Woof!!! What next? I realised after going through my 3 ISTD journals very quickly, which are considered 'agents of chaos' in my industry that effective non fiction reading have enough potential to take me to the echeleon of perfertion and still there is a lot of work to do about it.

Next in the pipeline is Bertrand Russell!!! I have read his two books already in the final year and i remember how it became in show stopper in GD sessions among Computer Guys and Prof. Parashar. It is so very controvertial and direct that hits the belief system of very dogmatic RSS activist like Prof. Parashar himself.
When i completed my discourse on Mr. Russell which ofcourse is not worth to mention on this platform, i remember his contention of allegedly China's intervention on hinduism,skewed though, derailed to nuclear warfare and what not. Even his 'arajakta in samaj' theory was shattered in to tiny pieces by ,which now i can safely say as sharma-russell's 'Societal Paradigm and Nudity concept'.
Later on you wont believe Prof Parashar Organised a summit ya a very serieous summit in Goldern Jubliee Auditorium on GSTI's take on India's Nuclear collabration with USA for fullfillent of its 'Energy Needs'. He was a Nuclear Power Plant expert In Mech. Department and a highly decorated Faculty in area. He scientifically explained the consequences and deftly involved it with RSS's Belief system. I admire him for what ever he has to say; atleast he has a POV( Pt. Of View) of his own.